If none of the nominees receive a majority of the votes, what happens next?

In situations where no nominee receives a majority of the votes, it is typically the case that the decision-making power reverts to the existing board members or governing body to select a winner. This mechanism is intended to ensure that a definitive outcome is reached, even in cases where the voting does not yield a clear majority.

The rationale behind allowing current board members to decide the winner is rooted in the principle of maintaining governance and continuity within the organization. When an election does not produce a clear victor, the existing members possess the experience and knowledge about the candidates and the needs of the organization, allowing them to make an informed decision.

This process helps prevent uncertainty and ensures that the organization continues to function without significant disruption due to an unresolved election outcome. It also avoids the complications and costs that could arise from holding a runoff election or repeating the election process entirely. Thus, allowing current board members to decide fosters stability and effective leadership within the organization.