What decision does the Board make regarding requests for administrative hearings?

The Board has the responsibility to assess each request for an administrative hearing on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the merits and relevance of the request. Granting or denying the request reflects the Board’s authority to ensure that hearings are conducted judiciously and only when justified. This decision-making process is critical because it helps maintain the proper administration of justice and ensures that only valid or significant cases proceed to a hearing.

In this context, other options do not accurately portray the Board's function. The requirement to notify individuals within a specific timeframe may be part of procedural rules, but it does not encapsulate the essential decision-making process. Automatically approving all requests is impractical and does not adhere to the principle of careful legal scrutiny. Lastly, providing recommendations for future requests would not fall under the direct decision-making responsibilities of the Board when it comes to individual cases; their role focuses on the adjudication of the current requests at hand. Thus, the ability to grant or deny requests is the most appropriate answer.